Now then; does the title of this posting not sound like it could be the title to a Seinfeld episode? Quite natty I feel. Alas, that is where the joviality of this posting ends. Whilst I am sure that many of you reading this will find it hilarious, I do not.
You may remember that the week before last I was “off sick” all week. Knowing full well that any sick leave beyond three days in length had to be sanctioned by a doctor’s note, I took a calculated risk and decided to not attend the doctor. This was for several reasons:
1) I was not, in the conventional understanding of the word, sick.
2) 18 months ago when I took a [more conventional] week’s sick leave, I was not asked for any such doctor’s note upon my return.
3) I could not be bothered.
All was swell until late last week, when the “manager” asked me for my doctor’s note. I pleaded ignorance. This did not work. I said that I would see the doctor (as it happens, I shall be seeing him tomorrow) and mention it to him, knowing full well what he is likely to say to me. The hope was that it would buy me some time. It did not. Yesterday, the manager asked me again for the note – I can’t help but feel that if it was somebody else, she would not be this persistent. Put it this way, she has yet to be so persistent on anything work-related. I think this is turning into a witch-hunt, or at least a Budding Barrister hunt. Ignorance not having worked, my lawyer super powers then kicked-in and I unleashed my nuclear weapon: reasonableness. Why, I implored, would I go to the doctors after three days if I had flu? I know what’s wrong with me, getting out of bed or out of a chair is (when you actually do have a flu) a traumatic experience. Am I to be expected to venture out (nigh-on impossible when within the grips of flu) to the docs, only for him to say ‘you’ve got the flu, there’s nothing I can do or prescribe for you – just drink plenty of fluids, get plenty of rest and take paracetamol’? Come now. This approach worked not. Apparently, they need ‘some kind of record’.
Ok, so, before any of you start on this one, I know I’m in the wrong, but it has become a matter of principle (don’t say it!!) and, in fairness, I’m only taking back time which is owed me anyway. I feel like Bart Simpson when he witnesses the [lack of] assault on a French waiter by Diamond Joe Quimby’s nephew, but does not want to testify because then Principal Skinner will have the evidence he needs to prove that Bart was playing truant. My final assault, if pushed, will be that of expectation. Last time I was not asked for a doctor’s note, so I had the legitimate expectation that I would not need one this time. Furthermore, having phoned-in to the office every day whilst off, there was ample opportunity to instruct me accordingly at the time. Honestly; some people just have no morals!
You may remember that the week before last I was “off sick” all week. Knowing full well that any sick leave beyond three days in length had to be sanctioned by a doctor’s note, I took a calculated risk and decided to not attend the doctor. This was for several reasons:
1) I was not, in the conventional understanding of the word, sick.
2) 18 months ago when I took a [more conventional] week’s sick leave, I was not asked for any such doctor’s note upon my return.
3) I could not be bothered.
All was swell until late last week, when the “manager” asked me for my doctor’s note. I pleaded ignorance. This did not work. I said that I would see the doctor (as it happens, I shall be seeing him tomorrow) and mention it to him, knowing full well what he is likely to say to me. The hope was that it would buy me some time. It did not. Yesterday, the manager asked me again for the note – I can’t help but feel that if it was somebody else, she would not be this persistent. Put it this way, she has yet to be so persistent on anything work-related. I think this is turning into a witch-hunt, or at least a Budding Barrister hunt. Ignorance not having worked, my lawyer super powers then kicked-in and I unleashed my nuclear weapon: reasonableness. Why, I implored, would I go to the doctors after three days if I had flu? I know what’s wrong with me, getting out of bed or out of a chair is (when you actually do have a flu) a traumatic experience. Am I to be expected to venture out (nigh-on impossible when within the grips of flu) to the docs, only for him to say ‘you’ve got the flu, there’s nothing I can do or prescribe for you – just drink plenty of fluids, get plenty of rest and take paracetamol’? Come now. This approach worked not. Apparently, they need ‘some kind of record’.
Ok, so, before any of you start on this one, I know I’m in the wrong, but it has become a matter of principle (don’t say it!!) and, in fairness, I’m only taking back time which is owed me anyway. I feel like Bart Simpson when he witnesses the [lack of] assault on a French waiter by Diamond Joe Quimby’s nephew, but does not want to testify because then Principal Skinner will have the evidence he needs to prove that Bart was playing truant. My final assault, if pushed, will be that of expectation. Last time I was not asked for a doctor’s note, so I had the legitimate expectation that I would not need one this time. Furthermore, having phoned-in to the office every day whilst off, there was ample opportunity to instruct me accordingly at the time. Honestly; some people just have no morals!